preemption UNITED STATES v. MORROS,No. 00-173309th Circuit10/15/01
Supremacy Clause is sufficient to confer federal court jurisdiction US v. MORROS
| Court: | U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals |
| Topic: | Civil Procedure, Environmental Law |
| Title: | US v. MORROS |
| Date: | 10/15/01 |
| Case Number: | 00-17330 |
| Summary: |
United States' permit applications may still "stand as an as we noted in Watkins, the NWPA clearly says that there will be a national nuclear waste repository and that the site of this repository will be recommended by the President and approved by Congress.43 Second, even if Congress has not occupied the field of nuclear waste disposal, "state law is still pre-empted to the extent it actually conflicts with federal law."44 Nevada Revised Statute 459.910 may "conflict" with federal law by purporting to make a decision on a state level that the NWPA contemplates will be made by the national government. The fact that the NWPA contemplates state participation through the notice of disapproval strengthens this argument.45 Thus, we hold that the United States' preemption argument is substantial and that 28 U.S.C. § 1331 therefore supplies jurisdiction in this case. In addition to jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1331,
the _________________________________________________________________ The federal government's claim that the Nuclear Waste Policy Act preempted Nevada state law prohibiting nuclear waste storage in state under the Supremacy Clause is sufficient to confer federal court jurisdiction.
US v. MORROS10/15/0100-17330Supremacy Clause jurisdiction
|